Notice how only Gustavo answers instead of Shareffah and Dave, Leon and Eliseo never bother to reply. Also notice the evasive and patronizing response from Gustavo.
This is Arin's first email. I won't sum it up as it speaks for itself.
From: heyarin heyarin@sonic.netNext up is Gustavo's response.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:34:14 -0700
To: Shareefah Joseph sjoseph@seiu-uhw.org, Gustavo Corral
gcorral@seiu-uhw.org, "L. Chow" lchow@seiu-uhw.org, "E. Medina"
emedina@seiu-uhw.org, "D. Regan" dregan@seiu-uhw.org
Conversation: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Subject: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Dear Ms. Joseph,
I understand from talking with another homecare worker today that SEIU UHW intends to bar members from the upcoming contract ratification vote if they, like myself, have exercised our rights by signing petitions to decertify SEIU. In addition, members have been denied copies of the tentative agreement to study before the vote and we still haven't been informed if we're being switched from our Kaiser health coverage to a United Healthcare plan. Members receiving on-going medical treatment or who are scheduled for surgery are very concerned about life threatening interruptions in their care and about finding a doctor with an open practice on short notice.
You have stated that the contract ratification vote will take place at three separate meetings instead of by a mailed ballot. Requiring homecare workers to attend meetings in order to be informed about the TA [tentative agreement] and to vote on it disenfranchises many of our 3000 members. It's especially hard on those who must travel in from outlying areas and workers who cannot leave their IHSS clients until they find a qualified substitute. Mailing postcards this week about next week's meetings doesn't give us enough time to make arrangements to participate and does not constitute adequate notice.
We worked very hard to bring in a union and when I served on the first bargaining committee we kept members regularly apprised of our progress toward that contract. The TA was available to all and our ratification votewas carried out by mail-in ballots as have all subsequent votes therefore I am requesting on behalf of all Sonoma County IHSS workers that SEIU observe its past practices in this county and mail out ballots for contract ratification and to make available to all workers requesting one a complete copy of the tentative agreement with the county for our bargaining unit by the close of the business day tomorrow, Sept. 16th, 2009. To do any less confirms that SEIU is hiding a substandard agreement from us.
Yours truly,
Arin Stevens
Sonoma County IHSS worker
From: Gustavo Corral gcorral@seiu-uhw.orgArin takes another whack at it.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:52:43 -0700
To: heyarin heyarin@sonic.net, Shareefah Joseph sjoseph@seiu-uhw.org,
Leon Chow lchow@seiu-uhw.org, "E. Medina" emedina@seiu-uhw.org, Dave
Regan dregan@seiu-uhw.org
Cc: Gustavo Corral gcorral@seiu-uhw.org
Conversation: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Subject: RE: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Hello Arin,
First, I hope you and Caterine are doing well. Second, I apologize for interjecting on your letter to Reefah. However, since you included me in this email and since I've been part of the entire bargaining process in Sonoma I feel the responsibility to respond and clarify some of your concerns.
As you may or may not know, before beginning negotiations, members of the bargaining team were elected at different membership meetings held throughout Sonoma County. We surveyed all Sonoma homecare providers through a mail-in survey on the top priorities the members wanted the bargaining team to bargain for.
The bargaining team members who were elected have been participating consistently throughout the process, including counting and tallying the surveys. As a result, they knew what the top priorities of the membership were after finishing the count, which created a negotiation platform for the team.
In addition, the bargaining team decided to hold this ratification differently because our contract expires on September 30 and we would not have had enough time to ratify it by mail. Thus, Sonoma members would have been left without a contract. Given the financial crisis that the State and County are facing these days, if Sonoma members had been left without a contract, the members would have been vulnerable for some drastic cuts. It seemed like the county intended to make drastic cuts because before negotiations began, the county sent all homecare workers a notice announcing a wage cut (you may have received this notice as well).
The bargaining team is a very coherent and cohesive group of members working very diligently and looking after the entire membership, not just a few individuals, sometimes sacrificing personal benefit on the decisions they've made.
All homecare members in good standing with the union in Sonoma County including you if that it's the case, are encouraged to attend and vote at any of the three locations: South, Central, and North Sonoma County. You should be getting a notice in the mail soon.
Lastly, I want to say that I have always respected and appreciated your contributions to the union as you were active in the past. The bargaining team needs your support to ratify this contract just like you needed them years ago when you were a bargaining team member. They've done a great job, and I'm sure any of them will gladly explain to you the TA we have reached with the Sonoma PA.
Take care,
Gustavo Corral
Homecare Division
SEIU-UHW
PH 415-503-5704
Fax 415-563-9914
www.seiu-uhw.org
From: heyarin heyarin@sonic.netAnd finally Gustavo writes back but says nothing.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:20:27 -0700
To: Gustavo Corral gcorral@seiu-uhw.org
Cc: Shareefah Joseph sjoseph@seiu-uhw.org, "L. Chow" lchow@seiu-uhw.org,
"E. Medina" emedina@seiu-uhw.org, "D. Regan" dregan@seiu-uhw.org
Conversation: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Subject: Re: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Hello Gustavo,
I appreciate your timely response to my concerns and I also hope you and your family are well. Your reply raises more questions and concerns regarding the contract negotiations and ratification process in Sonoma County.
I was not notified by mail, email or phone message of any meetings to elect a bargaining team in my area and after calling several other members in other parts of the county I found only one who received notification. Everyone did receive the bargaining survey and most of us returned it. When did these meetings occur? What types of notices went out and why were some members notified and not others? How can the bargaining team accurately reflect the membership of our bargaining unit when not all members were notified of an opportunity to participate?
The contract's expiration date was common knowledge so I am wondering why bargaining did not begin sooner? It's normal to file for an extension of the contract to protect members while bargaining continues so was the team ever informed of this practice?
As to the bargaining team making the decision to hold meetings instead of a mail-in ballot to ratify the contract: why have they and SEIU staff chosen to disenfranchise so many members? Are they so unaware of the difficult conditions for many workers and their clients that they would deliberately sacrifice these members' voices in order to rush through a contract?
I've spoken to two members of your bargaining team who either can't and/or won't answer questions about the health care plan changes and the wage reopener. Who on the team truly understands these issues? Would you provide their contact information? And why are complete copies of the entire contract being withheld from members? Many locals post their TAs on-line and make paper copies available so why the secrecy around our TA? And, again, why the deviation from past contract ratification practices which gave every member the opportunity to vote?
Another concern I have with these ratification meetings is the format. Who is running them? Can we bring our consumers? Will civility guide the proceedings or will those with questions and concerns be shouted down or booed or ignored? How will we actually vote? Paper ballots? Show of hands? Voice vote? How will the votes be tallied? How will the results be announced? Will an independent observer verify the results?
Once again I'm requesting a complete copy of our proposed contract to be available today to members for study before the vote and asking that SEIU honor its own past practices and return to a mail-in ballot. Homecare workers should not be forced to travel long distances, travel at their own expense, pay for substitute caregivers or give up working hours so we can vote. This type of disenfranchisement and discrimination in civil elections would today never go unchallenged so why does SEIU treat homecare members this way? We deserve the right to vote privately and without coercion or intimidation or undue burdens of travel and expense. If you and the team have truly bargained a good contract then it will withstand examination and a vote by all members not just the minority that can attend meetings. I look forward to your response to these questions and concerns.
Yours truly,
Arin Stevens
Sonoma County IHSS Provider
From: Gustavo Corral gcorral@seiu-uhw.orgSo as you can see Arin asks Gustavo, a 10 year veteran of Local 250 turned UHW then Zombie UHW, many questions but gets few answers. And some of those questions receive radically different answers if you ask Gustavo in person.
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:13:22 -0700
To: heyarin heyarin@sonic.net
Cc: Shareefah Joseph sjoseph@seiu-uhw.org, Leon Chow lchow@seiu-uhw.org,
"E. Medina" emedina@seiu-uhw.org, Dave Regan dregan@seiu-uhw.org
Conversation: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Subject: RE: Sonoma Co. IHSS contract and vote
Hello Arin,
In response to your email, as I stated before all members in good standing
will be eligible to vote to ratify the Sonoma IHSS agreement. Good standing
means that as of the last paid period workers have paid their union dues and
have remained members of SEIU UHW and are IHSS providers in Sonoma County.
Again, we hope to see you there. By now you should have gotten the notice.
Thanks,
Gustavo Corral
Homecare Division
SEIU-UHW
PH 415-503-5704
Fax 415-563-9914
www.seiu-uhw.org
Arin,
ReplyDeleteWell done. This is apalling. We always did homnecare votes by mail for exactly the reasons you lay out: To make the voting process accessible to all. Words fail in describing how disgraceful it is for the trustees of UHW to withold the TA's from members of the bargaining unit.
Gustavo, my former brother: You should be ashamed of yourself. Whoever is writing your material for you knows nothing about unions as a workers movement. I used to believe that you were a comrade with a soul. I am sad to now understand how mistaken I was. By allowing yourself to become part of this anti-democratic travesty, and allowing your name to be on those emails to Arin, you have put your own career interests above the interests of homecare workers. I can't think of anything worse.
Dana Simon
danasimon@comcast.net
Gustavo el esquirol sin vergüenza, you're a scab.
ReplyDeleteSomeone obviously wrote that piece for you. (I know you're an illiterate twit.)
You're doing this bit with the SEIU zombies cause you can't get any other job.
Where you gonna go when it all falls apart?